Be aware of harmful claims and narratives circulating online

Industries and organisations need to know what is circulating online. Messaging apps, websites and research documents produce text at a scale humans cannot review and LLMs cannot effectively handle.

Our models process millions of sentences across 114 languages, surfacing disputed narratives and controversial claims judged against your trusted sources.
text stream resolving into Noteworthy claims
Collected 114 languages
Verified
412
Supported
63
Disputed
190
Opinion
Works with
Telegram
WhatsApp
X
Instagram
+ more
Defence, intelligence, and media intelligence engagements — proof line to be pinned to a named engagement.
Diagram showing online sources like news site, article, PDF, research, web page, API database, and document feeding into Factive's claim detection system. Beneath, claims detected include vaccine causes infertility, election turnout hit 80%, GDP grew 2.1% in Q2, and bridge reopened Monday, with 1224 total claims.
01

Direct your resources to the most important claims and narratives

If you are gathering and analysing large amounts of text, the first challenge can be figuring where to focus your attention.

Factiverse finds the controversial claims inside millions of sentences in minutes. This enables analysts and researchers to spend more time on judgement on what is relevant for their reporting.
02

Tailor your verification pipeline with sources you trust

After each claim identified, it comes back with  evidence that supports or disputes it from sources that your teams trust.

You see at a glance what is corroborated, what is contested, and what rests on a single unreliable source. This informs teams on how reliable call each claims before it reaches them.
Interface panel titled 'You choose trusted sources' with options to verify claims against specific sources, showing 4 of 6 selected: Internal database, Government database, Academic archive, and Fact-check Database are checked; News wire and Social media are unchecked.
Comparison chart showing speed, cost, and accuracy for analyzing 1,000+ sentences between Claude/Gemini and Factiverse. Claude/Gemini speed is 29-50 minutes, Factiverse speed is 1.3 seconds, about 1,400 times faster. Claude/Gemini cost is $4.36, Factiverse cost is labeled lower with exact multiple on request. Accuracy for Claude/Gemini is baseline, Factiverse is matched or better with no trade-off.
03

LLMs cannot replicate this process

Running open-source volume through a large language model is too slow and too costly to sustain. Coupled with hallucinations this makes it unfeasible to effectively tackle textual information.

The Factiverse claim detection and verification models are built for exactly this. Verifying continuously across 114 languages at a cost that makes it viable.
Case study

We gave a NATO member state's analysts daily claim monitoring across Telegram in every language they needed

This case study discusses how a NATO defence force turned billions daily Telegram messages into a searchable claim database to assit their daily reporting.

100+

Telegram channels monitored and analysed daily.

114

Languages monitored across sources for teams who do not native speaker analysts.

24h

From message posted to claim surfaced in the daily roundup.

Turn open-source volume into verified intelligence

Book a consultation and Factiverse will scope verification around your sources and your tasking.

Frequently asked

Do you collect the text, or do we?

You collect as you do now, with whatever tools you already use. Factiverse takes the text you have gathered and verifies it. Collection stays yours; assessment is where we add value.

What kinds of text can it handle?

News and wire copy, social media and forum posts, blogs, reports, and research papers. If it is text, Factiverse can find the checkable claims inside it.

How do you verify a claim?

Each checkable claim is tested against the FactiSearch database and marked by the sources that support or dispute it, so you see what is corroborated and what rests on a weak or single source.

Why not just use an LLM for this?

LLMs work at small volume, but not at the throughput open-source work demands, where they become too slow and too costly. The Factiverse claim detection model is built for that scale.

Can it work in more than one language?

Yes. Verification runs across 114 languages, so foreign-language sources are assessed alongside English rather than left in a backlog.